Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kong, S. C., Yang, Y. N., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100328.
Yan, L., et al. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1115–1141.
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467.
Terwee, C. B., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating content validity. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1159–1170.